Public records request finally answered 2 months later

There is probably a statute that the LSBME violated in not returning my public records request in a timely manner, but they do not care. Since I have been patiently waiting for Dr. Culotta or Dr. Cresswell to reply to an email on December 27, 2018 I send a follow-up email…

Dr Culotta 
It seems you have neglected to address my concerns. Do public records requests not need to be answered as promised?  JM

He replies, albeit quickly…

2/27/2019 This has been referred to our legal staff and they are preparing your response

Dr. Cresswell responds the next day 2/28/2019…

Dear. Ms. M, Please see our responses below:
1.      Ms. Spooner miscalculated my payment plan. I have asked her several times to revisit the numbers. She has not done this. 
Response:  I have reviewed Ms. Spooner’s email and have noted the miscalculation.  Total Administrative costs are $17,669.00
Proposed payment plan:  Repayment over 36 months:  35 payments of $500, with a final payment of $169.00
2.      I’ve asked for a new compliance officer be assigned to me as Ms. Spooner does not seem to be able to fulfill her job requirements competently.
Response: This will not be granted.
3.      I requested a breakdown of the costs associated with my hearing i.e. attorney fees, copies, expert witness, judge, transcriptionist/court reporter, etc. 
Response: A detailed breakdown of your administrative hearing costs was sent to you on December 28, 2018 via email from Rita Arceneaux, as well as by US Mail to your address of record. Please verify that you are not in receipt of the December 28, 2018 email?
4.      When the LSBME has spent tens of thousands of dollars on computer software and equipment, why is my test I need to take to fulfill one of my sanctions not online yet? Why can it not be emailed to me? What is taking so long? The LSBME is obstructing justice by withholding the test I need to take to fulfill sanctions. 
Response:  Your test was placed online and you have successfully completed the examination on January 26th, 2019 (2nd attempt).
5.      What tests do I need to have administered by a doctor in order to fulfill my psyche evaluation? I have been asking for my diagnosis for over a year and the LSBME has failed to answer my simple question. I cannot simply call a doctor and ask for a psyche evaluation. Surely the medical board understands this. I need to know what tests need to be administered in order to even consult with doctors to see if they are able to conduct a psyche evaluation.
Response:  The LSBME does not diagnose.  You were given the name of Board approved facilities that provide Psychiatric Evaluations.  To clarify, you will need a “Forensic Assessment”.  A forensic assessment is one where the referral comes from a licensing entity.  The assessment is considered “forensic” due to it occurring within an administrative law context in which the facility is asked to provide an expert opinion regarding an individual’s fitness to practice.  The list of Board Approved facilities includes:

            Approved Psychiatric Evaluation/Treatment Centers:

Professional Renewal Center (PRC)

1421 Research Park Dr. #3B

Lawrence, KS 66049

T: 785-842-9772

Pine Grove/Next Step

2253 Broadway Dr.                

             Hattiesburg, MS 39402

T: 888-574-4673

Acumen Assessments

730 New Hampshire, Suite 222

Lawrence, KS 66044

T: 785-856-8218

Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare

Professionals Program

360 West Butterfield Rd., Suite 340

Elmhurst, IL 60126

           T: 630-615-7800   

If there is any additional information needed, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Ms. Spooner. 

Respectfully, Dr. Cresswell

I have discussed in earlier posts about the nature of PHPs. They are notoriously corrupt and work hand-in-hand with licensing boards. There is no justice in not choosing who can evaluate you especially when it is subjective and the licensing board is basically paying the PHP to diagnose their problem ppl. How is any of that fair?

Also, after looking up one of these assessment centers in Kansas, I find it ironic that they publish in PLOS (a free journal) the findings that a normative standard must be applied to your target audience or else you will overdiagnose the patients. Huh, I wonder if they have a norm for midwives. I am going to guess not. And then who will be held to an obstetrical standard again? Sigh.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650180/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/php-assessment-doctors-a-rigged-monopoly-needs-michael-langan-m-d-

I do not understand why I cannot get a competent compliance officer assigned to me. But then again, maybe that is the LSBME’s angle–to only hire incompetent people that will frustrate and drag out everyone’s sentence. Quite possibly.

I am glad the payment plan was finally recalculated correctly. SMH. Not that I have $500 to donate to the cartel for 3 years. But seriously, the fact that my license is suspended and I cannot work should make this criminal. How can I earn any measurable amount of money with a suspended license- but once again, a suspension is not indefinite- this is more like a revocation as a suspension has a time limit.

I finally get the test they want me to get. I am unsure if a fitness for duty is one size fits all or if I will have to again ask for more clarification. I contacted two psychiatrists today via email. I will see what they say. I am also going to call around tomorrow and see if any of these public mental health facilities will provide an evaluation. It appears that the state of Florida will provide services to people with adjudications regarding incompetency, but most are criminal or civil based. At this rate I think it would be easier for me to resolve all of my issues if I had a felony. The state seems to be ok with rehabilitating criminals on its dime while healthcare providers have to fend for themselves and cough up thousands of their own noninsurance dollars for their evaluations. I just cannot make this stuff up.

Think Licensure is a good idea? Think again.

As I study the latest Louisiana midwifery rules and regulations, for the test which will satisfy the third sanction that the LSBME has bestowed upon me i.e. “Ms. Macaluso shall demonstrate her understanding of the Board’s rules and regulations regarding Midwife practice in this state, in a manner determined by the Board,” I wonder how in the world did these updated rules get promulgated?

Read rules here:
https://www.lsbme.la.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Rules/Individual%20Rules/Midwife%20Dec%202016.pdf

*side note, I wanted to demonstrate my understanding of the Board’s rules in either an interpretive dance or a book report, but apparently those suggestions were shot down in favor of a boring test. The Board obviously lacks humor. LOL But seeing that the LSBME has spent tens of thousands of dollars on computer software and equipment in the past few years, its not surprising that they want to use that technology. Oh, wait…I am still waiting for my test “to be put online” according to my compliance officer. That was in October. They must’ve been taken advantage of if they paid that much and can’t email a test to me or put it online, but that is a whole other post.

Back to the rules….Is anyone paying attention? Did anyone read these new rules? They are that insane. There are so many examples, but I’ll start with the one in Chapter 23 under statute 2315 (Effect of Application) B. By submission of an application for licensing to the board, an applicant shall be deemed to have given his or her consent to submit to physical or mental examinations if, when and in the manner so directed by the board and to waive all objections as to the admissibility or disclosure of findings, reports, or recommendations pertaining thereto on the grounds of privileges provided by law. The expense of any such examination shall be borne by the applicant.

Let me tell you what that says in plain English: THE LSBME CAN REQUIRE MIDWIFE APPLICANTS TO HAVE A MENTAL AND PHYSICAL EXAM AND THE APPLICANT HAS TO PAY FOR THE EXAM. HOLY BLEEP!

The LSBME is calling midwife applicants crazy! While I have to admit I felt this whole witch hunt has been nothing short of crazy since the beginning, I never imagined these unbelievable rules would grow out of the Board’s unbridled lack of oversight. It is like a runaway train with no stop in sight. So one has to ask oneself—self, why would the Board institute such a rule? A rule which will undoubtedly frighten potential midwifery applicants, especially ones with any preexisting conditions. I mean, the Board does not describe what it will do with that information, so how will applicants know if their heart murmur or Hashimotos or depression will affect their application process? How does this rule not discriminate against applicants with preexisting conditions? How is this not antitrust? This seems like a rule ripe with restrictive capabilities to practice ones trade. And as someone who has been denied a license in another state, let me tell you how hard that makes getting a job or other licenses (again, another post). So, potential applicants will think they are going to start this new profession as a midwife in Louisiana, take all the classes, do all the training, take all the tests, pay the application fees, pay for a mental evaluation and may still get denied? Yes, yes, I know its a privilege to have a license, but this is ridiculous. Not only will it scare away potential applicants, but why would I want the medical board to have my medical records? That is invasive and wrong. And do you think the Board won’t implement that rule? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahYes, yes they will use it. How do I know this? Oh, because my first sanction is ordering me to get a mental/physical evaluation. No big deal right? Seems legit as they should make sure healthcare providers are relatively sane and healthy enough to do their jobs, but there is a catch. There is always a catch. Do you think they will allow you to go to just any doctor for this evaluation? I highly doubt it. Why am I so skeptical you say? Oh, it might stem from the fact that I have to go to a “physician or group of physicians who have been pre-approved in writing by the Board and be deemed competent to resume the practice of midwifery.” Ms. Mouton, the ex-executive director of the cartel, err I mean LSBME, so graciously offered me a list of five drug and alcohol rehabs to choose from to get my evaluation, but Ms. Mouton apparently does not know that a person cannot just go get an evaluation for no reason. The rehabs will not evaluate someone without a demonstrable problem. I know that seems obvious right? Not for the corrupt medical board as they don’t care about doing anything legal. Physician Health Programs (PHP) (like the drug and alcohol facilities list provided by Ms. Mouton) and medical boards make strange bedfellows until you realize they are both benefiting. The medical boards provide a steady stream of victims, err customers, err patients at the tune of $5-10,000 and four days of your life followed by “recommendations” for treatment which might mean several tens of thousands of dollars and months spent in a facility for absolutely no reason at all. There are many reports of the corruption surrounding PHPs and licensing boards. It was not until the admissions counselor at PineGrove in Mississippi reached out to my compliance officer that suddenly I was a perfect candidate for an extensive psych evaluation, even though after previously reading my court documents she had stated that I needed something their facility couldn’t provide. Sounds fishy because it is!

It is interesting to note that the LSBME has included this rule into most of the healthcare professions it oversees. So, doctors could be subject to this requirement of having an evaluation too. However, I could not find the rule associated with clinical laboratory personnel, acupuncturists, and X-ray techs. See list of professions below:

In a letter to the British Medical Journal, Dr. Manion states: “A compulsory forensic psychiatric evaluation of a physician is, by all understandings, a form of involuntary mental commitment whose unlawful use is banned by the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution prohibiting unlawful search and seizure by a government agency. Without rigorous oversight, a PHP can get away with utilizing what one court euphemistically referenced as “relaxed diagnostic criteria.” The extreme danger of crafting one’s own illness criteria sets, not to mention – especially in the context of refusal of provision of their report – falsely adding non-existent symptoms to embellish a case history to support a diagnosis and achieve desired outcomes (e.g. to appear to justify costly referral to a PHP preferred program), ought to alarm every physician.” https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i3568/rapid-responses

When Ms. Mouton was taken off her thrown at the LSBME and Dr. Cresswell stepped into her small stilettos, he, not surprisingly said, well of course you do not have to go to a drug and alcohol center as there is no basis for it in your case. Yeah, no shit. Dr. Cresswell suggested I find a doctor in my neck of the woods to conduct the evaluation. So, just go find a physician, right? There are 17,000 of them in Louisiana according to the 2018 census from the National Federation of Medical Boards. http://www.fsmb.org/advocacy/news-releases/fsmb-releases-2018-u.s.-medical-regulatory-trends-and-actions-report/

Well, it seems that in order to call a doctor and ask if you can have an evaluation by said doctor, one must have a diagnosis or something that needs testing. Ok, so ask the Board what they want tested. Go ahead. Ask. Oh, they won’t tell you what you need to have tested? Shocking. It is so shocking that the Board would create a sanction that is illegal. There is no legal basis for me to get a mental/physical evaluation. In fact, they will have to make something up in order for me to ethically have a mental evaluation. Yes, they will have to lie or the could remove that sanction as it really is not legal. But no, instead of looking like the incompetent fools they are, the Board would rather tell me to go find a doctor, then I am supposed to tell the doctor to call the board and ask what needs to be tested. UHHHHH. That is so shady.

I have been waiting and asking repeatedly for over a year to have the LSBME tell me what needs to be mentally evaluated as I cannot go get this sanction accomplished without more information or lies, whatever is considered ethical to the LSBME. The LSBME has caused me great stress and prohibited me from working. Oh, and let’s not forget, because I cannot get a job because my suspension comes up in a background check, I cannot afford health insurance to get my cancer removed. I will continue to wait patiently and suffer knowing that my cancer may be spreading and affecting my health.

The Board is purposefully obstructing justice. I believe that is called maleficence, but I am not an attorney. Is it truly that shocking that the Board would obstruct justice like this? No. The LSBME continues to violate ethics, harm midwifery by placing burdensome and egregious requirements on its applicants, which will undoubtedly limit choices for consumers in the state of Louisiana and continue its disgusting deathcare spiral killing mothers along the way. Killing mothers, you say? Isn’t that a little harsh? No, no it isn’t. There is a maternity crisis in Louisiana and throughout the US. https://adams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-adams-introduces-bill-address-maternal-mortality-racial

We do not have enough providers to give safe and effective maternity care. The South lags behind the rest of the country in maternal mortality especially for women of color. In fact, women of color in Louisiana are dying at a rate of 73/100,000 compared to 27/100,000 of white women. HOLY BLEEP. https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/health-of-women-and-children/measure/maternal_mortality/state/LA

Read that again– for every one white woman who dies in Louisiana almost three black women die. UHHHHHH. Something tells me doctors and hospitals are doing something wrong, very wrong. How do you know its doctors providing bad care? Because there are 17,000 of them in Louisiana compared to the 20 midwives practicing and licensed midwives do not work in hospitals. Doctors are killing women, not midwives. The LSBME needs to focus its investigations inward to truly achieve its mission statement of protecting the citizens of Louisiana. https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2017/11/13/mother-birth-america-louisiana-orig.cnn

The limiting of safe out of hospital providers by the competition needs to end. We need to be making more midwives not less. According to one study, Louisiana ranks as the worst place to have a baby because hospitals are not following safety measures. “The report also breaks down a state-by-state ranking of maternal harms and deaths. In Louisiana, the state with the highest maternal death rate, there were 58.1 deaths per 100,000 births over the course of the study period from 2012 to 2016.” https://www.cbsnews.com/news/best-and-worst-states-to-give-birth-usa-today-investigation/

Tell me again how out of hospital midwives are incompetent and dangerous. I’ll wait. Oh, you have no statistics to back up that claim? It is because midwives are beyond safe. We provide one-on-one care and are able to assess women constantly because of our philosophy and model of care. Sure it takes time and is cost prohibitive for the provider, but cost effective for insurance companies and Medicaid, and you know what–our women and babies are alive, happy, and grateful at the end of the day. And you know what is better than money—safety, lives, and an investment in future generations. If healthcare providers got into the healthcare field to help make a positive change in lives then it would be seem intuitive to promote midwives on the basis of evidence-based care alone. https://mana.org/blog/home-birth-safety-outcomes

The LSBME needs to follow the spirit of the law in order to rehabilitate its licensees and promote the welfare and health of its citizens by encouraging more midwives, if that is truly its intentions, and not harass, extort, and financially drain them out of existence. No one should be above the law especially a board who creates the very laws they are violating. And it would behoove them to adopt some ethics while they are at it.